Suggestion category: Low-cost innovations to improve AD/ADRD care. Reason for entry: While the "ideas" site is for RFIs about the best ways to structure and frame the NIA's Eureka grant, this "application-like" idea attempts to motivate the NIA to focus the grant on gaps in assistive technology which make care giving challenging and unnecessarily costly. Drug therapies and more recently Internet-based information systems... more »
Optimizing NIA’s Eureka Prize Competition Topic
We need your thoughts to optimize our intended Eureka Prize Competition on using technology to improve care for people living with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias.
Navigating the complex US healthcare system can be challenging for people living with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) and their caregivers. They must pursue an uncertain course of care of unknown duration across different care settings and interact with many different types of care providers and many different types of interventions. Models of dementia care have evolved in recent years and have the potential to improve outcomes. Barriers to adoption, however, include but are not limited to workforce limitations, the cost of practice redesign, and limited uptake by insurers and health systems.
The goal of our intended prize competition is to yield innovations that improve the quality of care for people living with AD/ADRD by establishing a proof of concept for the creation of a widely accessible and innovative technology tool(s) that addresses unmet needs in care coordination and/or care navigation through the health system. The concepts generated in this prize competition may be targeted at consumers (patients, caregivers), healthcare providers, healthcare service organizations, and/or health systems, and/or community, local, or state government, and will ideally foster connections between these stakeholders. For example, a collaboration between a technology company, EHR vendor and nursing home chain could yield EHR-based methods to improve care coordination.
We are looking for your ideas on the following topics as well as other related input that you would like to share:
• The possibility that this prize activity duplicates other ongoing activities in any relevant sector (e.g., academia, business)
• Attractiveness of this question to a broad audience of possible solvers
• The length of time solvers would need to develop a prize submission
• Metrics that judges might use to identify a winner
With most providers utilizing several different electronic health records and results from visits not share in the appropriate time frame. Or one shared patient portal related to his/her Alzheimer appointment. Recently has to take my family member to an urgent care facility as her PCP doesn't have weekend hours and we were at this appointment for five hours. My family member was severely dehydrated and required an... more »
Innovations in dementia care and support might be assessed against the following Likert scales: 1 = Not credible or convincing; 3 = Neutral; 5 = Very credible and convincing 1. The specific customer/stakeholder is clearly defined 2. The problem this customer is having is clearly described 3. This solution is clearly better (creates new value) than what exists now for this problem 4. The innovation/solution being proposed... more »
This past week I went in search of a physician who could assist me with a cognitive assessment in Nassau County. I reached out to one of my Geriatricians in the county who was immediately able to access my client's records, see his history and refer me to the appropriate Neuropsychologist. While I'm sure connecting records on a national level may be a daunting task - this process worked so expeditiously that I believe... more »